|
|
Centre for Logic, Epistemology and the History of Science (CLE) |
|
|
|
|
Rules and Instructions | Sites Pointing to CLE e-Prints |
|
ISSN 1519-9681 |
|
ISSN 1519-9614 |
|
|
||||
| . | ||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
The final version of this paper has been published . Carnielli, W., Coniglio, M.E., and Marcos, J.,
Logics of Formal Inconsistency. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edition, volume
14, pages 15-107. Springer-Verlag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Logics
of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) are logical systems that treat
consistency and inconsistency as mathematical objects. These logics
permit the internalization of the notions of consistency and inconsistency
at the object-language level, resulting in very expressive logical
systems whose fundamental feature is the ability of recovering all consistent
reasoning, while still allowing for some inconsistency to be represented
without leading to deductive trivialization.
The paper
defines and exemplifies LFIs in all detail, expliciting the concepts
and definitions dealing with the property of explosion and showing how
this reflects on the principles of logic.
The C-systems
are introduced as the subclass of LFIs where consistency can be
expressed as a unary connective. Further, the dC-systems are introduced
as the C-systems in which the consistency connective is explicitly
definable in terms of other usual connectives. Particular cases
of dC-systems are da Costa's logics Cn, 1 £ n < w
Starting
from a fundamental example of LFI, the logic mbC, we show
how to introduce a large family of logics by controlling the propagation
of consistency, clarifying a procedure that allows one to define tailor-suited
LFIs. The paper dedicates a good deal of attention to semantical
tools (valuations and possible-translations semantics), showing several
results about uncharacterizability by finite matrices, and also discusses
some possibilities of algebraizing LFIs. Some perspectives on the
research about LFIs including applications to such diverse topics
as epistemic paradoxes and database theory are also discussed.
|
|
|
|
|